the critique of these studies brought to my attention the issue of my imagery being too literal. this was something i was not consciously aware of and now that it is in the future i can make a conscious choice to be literal or not. but for now, the question and challenge on my mind is how to incorporate the figure and the idea of growth without visually spelling out everything for the viewer? how do i pursue portraiture with this? keeping these ideas in mind, i am in the process of making adjustments to my original ideas in order to work on being less literal. things i am considering further are: paint application...the movement i include naturally, being more gestural and painterly as mentioned before, unpersonified flesh as a thread in the paintings, different stages of plant growth, different kinds of plant symbolism, how the figures relate to other elements in the paintings, what emotions are evoked.
here are some artists i find interesting:
A portrait (above) by Anders Zorn. what interests me about his works is the heavy brush strokes found in his paintings; there is evidence of his hand and at the same time fine rendering as seen in the face of the portrait. i find the artists Jenny Saville and Justin Mortimer interesting for the same reason. however they also depict subjects that disturb and create a mood of discomfort. having a slightly gothic nature, i am drawn to the macabre.
Paintings by Justin Mortimer above; a Saville below
Finally, there is one more artist i feel i should mention and that is Frida Kahlo. Since i have started studying painting i have had people tell me repeatedly that something about what i do as a painter brings her to mind for them. i believe that there is something in the kind of images that i come up with; they have a surreality to them, there is a story behind them and they are often rooted in personal experience.
No comments:
Post a Comment